Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÇϾǰñ ÃøÁ¤½Ã Àü»êÈ­´ÜÃþ»çÁø»óÀÇ Á¤È®µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸: ÇÏ¾Ç À§Ä¡¿Í gantry°¢ÀÌ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Accuracy of CT image in measuring the mandible for implant : Effect of mandibular position and gantry angle

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1998³â 28±Ç 1È£ p.225 ~ 234
ÃÖ¼øö, À̻Q, ÃÖÇ×¹®, ¹Ú·¡Á¤,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖ¼øö (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
À̻Q (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
ÃÖÇ×¹® (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
¹Ú·¡Á¤ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ

Abstract

¼º°ß 5¸¶¸®ÀÇ ÇϾǰñÀ» ·¹Áø¿¡ Æ÷¸ÅÇÑ ÈÄ Àü»êÈ­´ÜÃþ»çÁøÀ» ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº Á¶°Ç¿¡¼­ ÃÔ¿µÇÏ
¿© ¾ò¾îÁø Çù¼³´Ü¸é»ó¿¡¼­ Ä¡Á¶Á¤-ÇϾǰü°£ °Å¸®, Çù¸é-ÇϾǰü°£ °Å¸®, ¼³¸é-ÇϾǰü°£ °Å
¸®¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ëÁ¶±ºÀº ÇϾǰ¢(ÇϾÇÀÇ ±³ÇÕ¸éÀÌ ¼ö¼±°ú ÀÌ·ç´Â °¢) 0¡£,
gantry°¢ 0¡£·Î ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ½ÇÇ豺Àº °¢°¢ ÇϾǰ¢ 15¡£, gantry°¢ 0¡£(1±º);ÇϾǰ¢ 30¡£,
gantry°¢ 0¡£(2±º);ÇϾǰ¢ 15¡£, gantry°¢ 15¡£(3±º), ÇϾǰ¢ 30¡£, gantry°¢ 30¡£(4±º)·Î ÇÏ
¿´´Ù. ¾ò¾îÁø °á°ú´Â ¾Æ·¡¿Í °°´Ù.
1. Ä¡Á¶Á¤-ÇϾǰü°£ °Å¸®´Â 1±º°ú 2±º¿¡¼­´Â ´ëÁ¶±ºº¸´Ù ÄÇÀ¸¸ç 3±º°ú 4±º¿¡¼­´Â ´ëÁ¶±º
º¸´Ù ÀÛ¾Ò´Ù. Çù¸é-ÇϾǰü°£ °Å¸®¿Í ¼³¸é-ÇϾǰü°£ °Å¸®´Â ¸ðµç ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ ´ëÁ¶±ºº¸´Ù ÀÛ
¾Ò´Ù.
2. ´ëÁ¶±º°ú °¡Àå Å« Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÎ ÃøÁ¤ Ç׸ñÀº Ä¡Á¶Á¤-ÇϾǰü°£ °Å¸®¿´À¸¸ç ƯÈ÷ 2±º°ú 4
±º¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ÄÇ´Ù(p<0.05).
3. ´ëÁ¶±º°úÀÇ ¿ÀÂ÷°¡ 1§® ÀÌÇÏÀÎ °æ¿ì´Â Ä¡Á¶Á¤-ÇϾǰü°£ °Å¸®¿¡¼­´Â 3±ºÀÌ 20°³·Î °¡Àå
¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç 2±º°ú 4±º¿¡¼­ 11°³·Î °¡Àå Àû¾ú´Ù.
4. Çù¸é-ÇϾǰü°£ °Å¸®¿Í ¼³¸é-ÇϾǰü°£ °Å¸®´Â ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡ ´ëÁ¶±º°úÀÇ ¿ÀÂ÷°¡ Å©Áö
¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
We used five adult dog mandibles embedded in resin block and six different
cross-sectional planes for each mandible were choosen. According to the angle of
mandibular occulsal plane to vertical plane(mandibular angle) and gantry angle of CT
machine, we classified 4 experimental groups and 1 control group.
The control group images were taken at the mandibular angel 0¡£ and gantry angle 0
¡£. The experimental images were taken at the mandibular angle 15¡£ and gantry angle
0¡£(group 1); 30¡£ and 0¡£(group 2); 15¡£ and 15¡£(group 3); 30¡£ and 30¡£(group 4),
respectively. Using the reformatted cross-sectional images, the distance from the
mandibular canal to the alveolar crest and the distance from the mandibular canal to the
buccal cortex and to the lingual cortex was measured and compared.
The obtained results were as follows :
1. The distance from the mandibular canal to the alveolar crest of group 1 and 2 was
larger than control group, but the distance of group 3 and 4 was smaller. The distance
from the mandibular canal to the buccal cortex and to the lingual cortex of all
experimental groups was smaller than control group.
2. The distance from the mandibular canal to the alveolar crest showed the largest
difference from control group in all experimental groups, especially in group 2 and
4(p<0.05).
3. In the distance from the mandibular canal to the alveolar crest, the number of
deviation value under 1 §® was 20 in group 3 and was 11 in group 2 and 4,
respectively.
4. The deviation value of the distance from the mandibular canal to the buccal cortex
and to the lingual cortex was under 1 §® in most cases.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸